Surgical Safety Does Not Happen By Accident: Learning From Perioperative Near Miss Case Studies.

Adverse surgical events cause negative patient health outcomes and harm that can often overshadow the safe and effective patient care provided daily by nurses as members of interprofessional healthcare teams. Near misses occur far more frequently than adverse events and are less visible to nurse leaders because patient harm is avoided due to chance, prevention, or mitigation. However, near misses have comparable root causes to adverse events and exhibit the same underlying patterns of failure. Reviewing near misses provides nurses with learning opportunities to identify patient care weaknesses and build appropriate solutions to enhance care. As the operating room is one of the most complex work settings in healthcare, identifying potential weaknesses or sources for errors is vital to reduce healthcare-associated risks for patients and staff. The purpose of this manuscript is to educate, inform, and stimulate critical thinking by discussing perioperative near miss case studies and the underlying factors that lead to errors. Our authors discuss 15 near miss case studies occurring across the perioperative patient experience of care and discuss barriers to near miss reporting. Nurse leaders can use our case studies to stimulate discussion among perioperative and perianesthesia nurses in their hospitals to inform comprehensive risk reduction programs.

Surgical Team Structure: How Familiarity and Team Size Influence Communication Effectiveness in Military Surgical Teams.

INTRODUCTION: Preventable patient harm has persisted in health care despite recent advances to reduce errors. There is increasing recognition that non-technical skills, including communication and relationships, greatly impact interprofessional team performance and health care quality. Team familiarity and size are critical structural components that potentially influence information flow, communication, and efficiency. METHODS: In this exploratory, prospective, cross-sectional study, we investigated the key structural components of surgical teams and identified how surgical team structure shapes communication effectiveness. Using total population sampling, we recruited surgical clinicians who provide direct patient care at a 138-bed military medical center. We used statistical modeling to characterize the relationship between communication effectiveness and five predictors: team familiarity, team size, surgical complexity, and the presence of surgical residents and student anesthesia professionals. RESULTS: We surveyed 137 surgical teams composed of 149 multidisciplinary clinicians for an 82% response rate. The mean communication effectiveness score was 4.61 (SD = 0.30), the average team size was 4.53 (SD = 0.69) persons, and the average surgical complexity was 10.85 relative value units (SD = 6.86). The surgical teams exhibited high variability in familiarity, with teams co-performing 26% (SD = 0.16) of each other's surgeries. We found for every unit increase in team familiarity, communication effectiveness increased by 0.36 (P ≤ .05), whereas adding one additional member to the surgical team decreased communication effectiveness by 0.1 (P ≤ .05). Surgical complexity and the influence of residents and students were not associated with communication effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: For military surgical teams, greater familiarity and smaller team sizes were associated with small improvements in communication effectiveness. Military leaders can likely enhance team communication by engaging in a thoughtful and concerted program to foster cohesion by building familiarity and optimizing team size to meet task and cognitive demands. We suggest leaders develop bundled approaches to improve communication by integrating team familiarity and team size optimization into current evidence-based initiatives to enhance performance.

Nonpharmacological Cognitive Impairment Prevention Interventions in Older Adults Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: More than 1 million individuals undergo cardiothoracic surgery for coronary artery bypass graft or valve repair/replacement annually in the United States. There is an increased risk of developing serious cognitive impairment post cardiothoracic surgery. Pharmacological interventions and surgical techniques were associated with improvements in cognitive function in previous systematic reviews. However, a gap in the literature exists regarding how nonpharmacological interventions can mitigate cognitive impairment in adults undergoing cardiac surgery. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions to reduce the detrimental effects of cardiac surgery on cognitive function in patients after cardiothoracic surgery. METHODS: CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases were searched following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines from January 2011 to February 2022. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included in this review. Researchers defined cognitive impairment differently across studies. Various interventions were used to reduce cognitive impairment post cardiothoracic surgery, with the most common being remote ischemic limb conditioning. The interventions used to reduce cognitive impairment were heterogeneous in outcomes, measurements, and time of assessment, but only 2 interventions were associated with a reduction in cognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS: This review is a unique synthesis of the quality of interventions that address broader components of cognition. Researchers used various interventions to reduce cognitive impairment; the outcomes, instruments, and time interval for measurements were heterogeneous. Researchers should conduct future studies at multiple time intervals, using a comprehensive measure of cognitive impairment to better understand the impact of cognitive impairment interventions postoperatively.